By Vivaan Shah
SPOILER ALERT
I first
remember getting a glimpse of a queer black and white image from ‘High and
Low’ on TCM, while channel surfing through an Onida CRT in the early 2000s.
This was after Cartoon Network had made the shift to Hindi, and had become an
all night station, relegating the erstwhile TNT that would initially follow
its closing hours to the margins of even obsolescence. A tall over corpulent
black man was twisting to surf rock in a dingy Tokyo nightclub trying to arouse
the attentions of a quaint looking Japanese babe who slinkingly evaded his
every advance like an alley cat, with a shoulder shift, her body language timed
mechanically yet methodically to the music.
There was something determinedly
early '60s about the image. All it took was one appearance of a pair of neon
soaked Wayfarers strapped around a lanky Japanese drifter, to make you realize
it was 1963. The revelation that came later on that it was an Akira Kurosawa movie, in
the commercial break when they would grace you with a customary run down on the
info, was matched only with the uncanny inappropriateness of this picture, that
stood out like a sore thumb as it is on the tube, which at the time was stocked
mostly with sporting channels, Star Movies, Star World, AXN, and the other 24
or 25, sometimes up to 30 channels that would loiter around on old run down box
sets with the empty channel slots brooding silently at the end in fuzzy
contemplation of the dawn of the various spiritual leaders and the regional
channels that would conquer their weather beaten grounds.
The movies that one spots while channel
surfing tend to stay with one longer. It is a simple principle of attraction,
what catches one’s eye. For me it’s been mostly obscure '80s, '90s fare that one
tends to gravitate towards primarily for anthropological reasons. I equated the
biker jackets and Hells Angels regalia from Peter Bogdanovich’s ‘Mask’ with Tim
Hunter’s ‘River’s Edge’ for its small town denim aesthetic. Both movies
spoke to disenchanted youth, (the latter being a kind of pre-Columbine
testimony) and both had a jaded hipster swagger. Spike Lee’s 'Jungle Fever' and
Michael Corrente’s 'Federal Hill', both early '90s neighborhood stories with
young agitated blue collar Italian American hoods, had a similarly eye-catching
fashion sense. The grazed crew cuts, and neo-ducktails, the vivid nylon track
pants, and white vests with silver chains dangling over. These images were
fascinating for sub-cultural reasons, because one grasps them entirely at face
value, and hence engages or disengages involuntarily. It’s similar to the kind
of people one finds interesting while walking the street. Needless to say I
would have probably never heard of these movies had I not encountered them
while flipping channels.
The police trying to trace the kidnapper |
What was uncanny about the image of a black
man dancing to rock n roll in a Kurosawa film (who was primarily known for his
more traditionally rural epics) was that this urban shift was the visual
equivalent of poetic gibberish. A ragged melody of nonsense verse amid a pretty
stiff and hardboiled film, that was enough of a non-sequitur to make even Lucky
from Waiting for Godot sit down and take notice. From the nightclub we cut to a
racing police car with a siren blaring on top and one of those rear projection
shots trailing behind, the occupants of the vehicle, presumably officers
broadcasting reports straighfaced into a police radio, to remind us that this
is a genre piece. It has been described as one of the finest of police
procedurals, and it is painstaking in detail as it develops its Dostoevskian
dilemma. Toshiro Mifune plays Gondo, a shoe magnate in corporate Tokyo (which
was kind of prefigured by his turn as Kurosawa’s wounded Hamlet in 1959’s ‘The Bad Sleep Well’) who’s son has been kidnapped. But the catch here being that
the kidnapper has mistakenly abducted his chauffeur's son instead of his own
offspring. The dilemma here presented has enormous sociological implications. And
if the moral crisis wasn’t enough Kurosawa has him have to give up his entire
hard earned fortune for the return of the child. There’s a particularly
disturbing scene as this conflict erupts. The driver starts literally
grovelling at his feet, telling him that his son and even his son’s son would
spend their entire lives in service of him in gratitude for his benevolence.
Mifune’s face is a landscape of moral crisis. It’s like what Nicholas Ray said
about Bogart’s face. ‘He was the very image of our condition. His face was a
living reproach.’ Mifune’s Gondo is older and more worn out, physically and
mentally from his earlier turns for Kurosawa. Gone is Hamlet’s unease, and the proletarian hero-ship of his Samurai icons. He is now a shrewd, calculating businessman,
desperately clutching to his savings like a disgruntled tigress irritatedly pawing
at her impoverished cubs. There’s a particularly moving bit towards the
beginning where he expounds rather eloquently on his love for shoes, and what
they mean to him to a drawing room full of discontented stockholders. He’s put
together every stitch and sole, with his own two hands. The entire first act is
like a set bound play. It all takes place in his living room and charts his
recorded phone correspondence with the kidnapper. Apparently the house is
somehow mysteriously in view of the kidnapper as he speaks. He looms large over
the proceedings like a figure of mystic significance, and his mocking wry tone
suggests a friendly contempt masking a particularly constrained derangement. The
house in his view, hovers intimidatingly over the lesser quarters surrounding
it, which he invariably belongs to as we are later to find out. When he’s
finally introduced to us in the reflection of a swamp puddle, after collecting
his ransom we follow him down the sidestreets into the underbelly of Tokyo.
Meanwhile the police have set up an elaborate operation detailing a vast
assortment of policeman in plainclothes, that jive inconspicuously with the
scenery we then journey into. The second half is like a different movie. The
radical shift in tone and dislocation of the central narrative, slowly takes us
into a methodical build up of exposition that never feels like such because it
is so firmly embedded in the nuts and bolts of the functionality of everyday
life in an investigation. The procedurality i.e the boring bits in real life,
start purring like a slow burn crystallization of the narrative motor, until
when he reach the aforementioned nightclub there’s so much tension that
there’s no place to turn to. To quote Jim Thompson in 1955’s The Killing, ‘you
feel like the walls are closing in’. The cops keep tailing the kidnapper
hobbling a dance step here and there to blend into the scenery, but yet firmly
keeping an eye planted on the drifter the whole time. We follow him first into a
nearly empty retreat where sedated people are lying around, some questionably
dead, due to a fatal dosage, then into a smack den down the backalleys and
gulleys and intersections that branch off into narrower bylanes and
sidestreets.
The smack den is almost depicted like a
mental institution, that could very well have mutated out of one of Ken Kesey’s
or William Borrough’s bum trips. A forlorn Cuckoo’s nest perched precariously
atop a mound of crowshit, its derelict inmates strewn among the wayside like fallen
players on a scattered chessboard. This is probably one of the first movies
where the drugs are an object of horror. A haggard lady rattles to her death in
a corridor as the background score reverberates in female shrieks dressed in
drag, that would have given even Ennio Morricone the shivers. She clasps onto a
wooden archway her body language distorting with the music into a kind of
Kabuki flop dance. We are up close on the torment, but we see her perishing from
afar in a quick drop shot that cuts into place with the broken swing of a door.
The film contains a masterful deployment of ‘O Sole Mio’ (later covered by
Elvis as ‘It’s now or never’) on an old radio, as our villain is surrounded by
his doom and finally captured by the police. His face is revealed in the floral
shadows and wavy motions of sinuous leaves quivering in a greenhouse. The once
smug expression in his wayfarers devolving into a delirious depiction of his
defeat. The torment in his eyes seems to cut through the darkglasses and
communicates the cracked despair residing inherently in stylization. It makes
one grasp the possibility that not only was Kurosawa a precursor to Leone, but
also to the hard-bitten school of darkglass filmmaking later perfected by such
stylistic specialists as Wong Kar Wai, Tarantino, and even John Woo.
His incarceration and confrontation with
Gondo to explain his actions, is the film’s tragic denouement. In Japanese
this film was called ‘Tengoku to Jigoku’, which means ‘Between Heaven and Hell’.
I am supposing the English title ‘High and Low’ has some narcotic connotations
as well metaphoric ones. His final conversation with Gondo is one of the most
harrowing confrontations ever filmed. It delves into agonizingly spiritual territory,
the wounded mud of class, the motives being primal almost unexplainable,
bordering on the inexplicable, like one of the unsolved mysteries of the
universe. ‘Maybe it’s because my house was always cold in the winter and hot in
the summer,’ he explains, trembling with shackled dignity. ‘I’m not afraid of
hell or damnation.’ He frowns, jittering with contempt. ‘My life has been a
hell for as long as I can remember’. But Gondo’s house in it’s high hilled
contentment was always a figure of oppression for him. It reminds one of Robert
Blake’s harrowing apology at the end of ‘In Cold Blood’. He might as well be
addressing God and not just Gondo, or a justice system. His body language in
this scene is difficult to accurately articulate. His violent trembling and
uncontrollable shaking seems to entangle his outward behaviour with a
subterranean volcano brewing deep within that prevents him from any kind of
physical stability whatsoever. When he finally goes out of control the glass
partition that separates them slams shut on him, consigning him to the infinite
isolation of the perdition that awaits him. We barely see Mifune’s reaction to
any of this, but we can just as well imagine it. His scowling wrinkles evoke an
understanding that transcends compassion or even retribution. It’s a deeply
disturbing conclusion and one that not only makes us see the villain’s point of
view in the morally constrained early '60s, but also gives us an insight into
his tortured psyche and the cobwebs of his soul.
This is the film that introduced me to
Kurosawa and made me realize some of the Gothic potential prevalent in his
work. At the time I was perhaps too young to fully appreciate the 7 disc set
L.D of ‘Seven Samurai’ I had been introduced to earlier, or the bloody
hallucinations of Lady Macbeth in an early VHS of ‘Throne of Blood’. But High
and Low spoke a visual language that I was deeply familiar with--the urban
crime film. And the fact that Kurosawa made it hints almost at an elderly
hipster residing within him that willfully decided to prowl around the haunts of
younger people with his watchful gaze and his eagle eye perception of Soddom
and Gomorrah. There’s nothing moralistic about Kurosawa, even though he
belonged to the pre-hippie generation like Kubrick and Peckinpah. But the
formal distance adds a potency to his images of debauchery that are a far cry
from the late 60s post Easy Rider transformation of drugs into a cavalier
activity--an obvious form of recreation which was the only escape from the
horrors of the world. Kurosawa implies that if heaven exists on earth, so does
hell; if humanity is capable of kindness and goodness and compassion, so is it
capable of unspeakable acts of terror that defy any easy Freudian
clarifications. It’s a kidnapping story, a morality play, a melodrama, a horror
film and a Kabuki curiosity all wrapped into a grainy black and white garb
that shreds apart at the seems with vivid, vibrant scope imagery, and even
though he charted similar urban terrain in his fierce ‘Stray Dog’ from 1946, and
would go on to show us a day in the life of a slum in his later ‘Dodes’ka-den’,
this is his primal cry from the bowels of a crumbling post-war Japan. It would
make a great double feature with Shohei Imamura’s ‘Vengeance is Mine’ (another
study of criminal pathology), or perhaps even Imamura’s ‘Black Rain’ (which is
about peasants living on the outskirts of Hiroshima and Nagasaki following the
bombings). Like Prince Hamlet finally crumbling into a jagged embrace with his
crippled Ophelia in a bomb shelter in ‘The Bad Sleep Well’, Kurosawa plumbs the
humanity implicit in his scenario with a strict severity, that never borders on
sentimentalism. He traverses the wastelands with the poetry of squalorto arrive
at an even higher plane--the muffled quandry of a delayed epiphany that never
quite makes sense to the mind, but strikes a strange chord with the soul. It
makes us realize that both the poor and the rich are consigned to a moral
purgatory. The faces and voices of the various characters take on a resolute
stillness, and a creased-world weariness, as if they are all aware of some deep
secret that might expose the hypocrisy inherent in a human predicament that has
existed since the dawn of mankind, but one that has not grown any less
troublesome or unsettling with the passage of time. I agree with Murtaza that ‘Dersu Uzala’ is the crystallization of all of Kurosawa’s pastoral poems, but ‘High
and Low’ is probably his howl from the gutters through the grammaphone of genre,
of officialdom, and ordinary people doing ordinary jobs to protect the
extraordinary from the transgressions of what is considered ordinary or even
normal. If as Gore Vidal put it ‘normality conjures images of vigorous
minutemen’ in pinstriped suits rushing to the commands of their superiors, then
the realm of the ordinary would probably lie in the unmined salt of the earth,
deeply buried in a tangle of red tape coloured with the blood of many confused
men and women seeking an answer to the inherent pain of existence. It’s an
existential piece, but then again what isn’t?
P.S. High and Low is also featured in our all time best 100 movies.
P.S. High and Low is also featured in our all time best 100 movies.
About Author -
Vivaan Shah is an actor, director, writer, musician, singer, and painter. He has tried his hands at various art forms though acting is the one through which he earns his bread and butter. He studied in The Doon School, St.Stephen's College and Jai Hind College. He has been active in the theatre scene since he was a child. Theatre is unquestionably the most important medium in his life. Currently he is trying to make it as a fiction writer of genre and hardboiled novels.
High and Low - Theatrical Trailer (YouTube)
Readers, please feel free to share your opinion by leaving your comments. As always your valuable thoughts are highly appreciated!
People who liked this also liked...
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for sharing for valuable opinion. We would be delighted to have you back.