The
curious case of Sir Carol Reed is something that can perhaps be attributed at
least in part to what Michael Atkinson refers to as the 'casualties of the
auteur theory'. Although he has more than a discernible style to his work he is
never quite regarded in the same fashion as his lauded contemporaries like
Hitchcock, John Ford, Howard Hawks et al. His practical craftsmanship was
always conflated with a workmanlike approach. Michael Powell said he could put
together a film the way a watchmaker puts together a watch. He is perhaps
mostly known in most circles as the director of 'The Third Man', a film whose
excellence has erroneously been credited to Orson Welles. It has been
mistakenly said that Welles directed part of the film. Nothing could be further
from the truth, and what is less spoken of is the fact that Welles himself considered
Carol Reed to be something of an idol, and by studying both their work in close
comparison, one can see where Welles' jagged fish eye aesthetic comes from.
Carol Reed must have been a huge influence, yet he is never regarded in the
same breath of veneration that has been bestowed upon Welles over the ages.
Carol Reed's body of work is singular and at times startling. He was a true
craftsman almost implementing cinema as a means for handicraft. There seemed
something handmade about his films and there was a workmanlike approach which
never ever bordered on the mechanical. Reed even at his most frivolous moments
was fiercely idiosyncratic. The lack of recognition of his style is perhaps
because it wasn't quite the invisible style of say someone like Hawks or the
one like Hitchcock where the technique deliberately calls attention to itself,
but where Reed excelled was at finding the poetry between the lines, both
visually and aurally. His experimentation with sound for one, the way he
composes the junior artists, the framing of movement, the faces he uses, the
native call of a passing hawker or peddler prancing the marketplace, the
cackling complaint of an elderly aunt leaning on a window frame. The jingle of
familiar jargon and a laser sharp eye for vernacular. The soundscape of Carol
Reed's films was unique, there was something sonically disorienting in the
way he employed sound and casual speech. Just look at the opening credits of 'A Kid for Two Farthings', the sound editing is way ahead of its time as he
mishmashes a radio broadcaster's monotoned voice, aggressively ambient Cockney
sounds, and a big band jazz standard. One of the key Carol Reed moments for me
is the opening of 'Our Man in Havana' which sees a street sharp gaze in
bewilderment at a prostitute across the road standing forlornly on a verandah.
He gets up contemplatively and walks over to her as the camera slowly tilts and
a finger plucked Cuban ballad furnishes the soundtrack slowly evaporating into
atmospheric sounds. She gives him an apple she has just taken a bite out of.
There is a no dramatic, logical or coherent reason for this scene to be there--yet
it is, and it is one of the most lyrical of moments, with an air of melancholy
and tenderness--cinema doing things that cinema alone can do.
Carol Reed really evoked the fabric of all his exotic locales,
and was probably most at home on his own turf in Mother England. His films like
'A Kid for Two Farthings' or even 'Oliver!' display a Dickensian understanding of
the underbelly. 'Odd man out' starring James Mason and Robert Newton, one of
his more acclaimed films is set in grand old Ireland and his dissection of the
Irish soil is worthy of Joyce, or Seamus Heaney. Give Carol Reed a street and
see the wonders he can do with it. If I were to recommend how to approach his
oeuvre, I would say start with his Grahame Greene trilogy i.e. The Third Man,
The Fallen Idol and Our Man in Havana. It was said that Grahame Greene refused
to give the film rights of 'Our Man in Havana' to Hitchcock in favour of Reed.
Then one should progress to his study of faces--carving the same canvas with a
crease or a wrinkle, the essence of a Boticelli or a Hogarth. Outcast of the
Islands, Odd Man Out, the extremely hard to find 'Ballad of the Running man',
even lesser films like 'The Man Between' set in post war Berlin, and 'Trapeze'
and last but not least, one of his most astonishing films--'A Kid for Two
farthings'. The impressions these pictures have on the heart and soul is
difficult to accurately express. There is realism far exceeding even the
furthest depths of Flaherty's documentary approach. Just see some of the faces
in Outcasts of the Islands. The film was shot in Sri Lanka in the early 50s and
it is my honest opinion that this film features some of the most interesting
faces ever put on film competing perhaps only with a Leone or an Eisenstein.
Although we have seen these kinds of native Dravidian faces before in Ray we've
never quite seen them deployed in this fashion.
A Still from Oliver! |
The early part of Reed's career was spent in service to her
majesty's command- London films, which was at the time run by Alexander Korda.
The Hungarian Kordas--Alex, Vincent and Zoltan were a director /designer / producer
trio. They manned some of the most far flung outposts of the colonial empire,
such as the Sudan in 'The Four Feathers', The North West frontier province of
Afghanistan in 1938's 'The Drum' starring Sabu, Corbett's forests in 1942's ‘Jungle
Book’, and even the Himalayas in the enchanting 'Black Narcissus'. As a matter
of fact it is my honest belief that Powell and Pressburger yielded some of
their finest output under them... even someone like David Lean's more modest
initial period. According to Andrew Sarris the Korda Brothers helped bring a
certain kind of gentility to the cinema and virtually invented the tradition of
quality in British cinema.
A Still from The Third Man |
Outcast of the Islands is an extremely hard to find film, but it
is one of those jewels you chance upon while sifting through the online
airwaves, or end up reading about by an investigation of the said person's
filmography. It's a truly splendid and comprehensive examination of the
civilized man vs savage dilemma. It also happens to be one of my favourite
novels of all time. I read Conrad's Outcast of the Islands whenever I am in
need of imminent transportation elsewhere. It's a book of travel, of lust and
greed, of adventures on the high seas, and also a fierce examination of what
constitutes a moral compass. It's one of the first truly uncompromising
accounts of an unscrupulous protagonist. Our protagonist Willems has been fired
from his company Hudig and co. for financial fraud and misappropriation. He
ditches his wife and family and is intercepted en route to committing suicide
by his benefactor and mentor, the elusive Captain Lingard, who spends his time
sailing the high seas and profiting off of a mysterious trading post, whose
latitudinal and longitudinal specification on the map is not known to anyone
but him. He takes Willems into confidence, being a sort of father figure to
him. It is simply a sight to behold two old salt thespian lions like Trevor
Howard and Ralph Richardson do wonders with Conrad's heroic rhetoric,
entrancing into it a sort of semi-Shakespearean delivery. There is poetry
between the lines too in the way Willems glances sideways at his savage
princess Aissa. One of the film's VHS covers proclaimed--'He dared to love a
cannibal empress,' followed by a litany of exclamation marks. It is impossible
to not address the racio-political aspects when talking of Conrad, or Kipling
or any of the old giants and masters of literature. These men for me were
larger than life and stood beyond good and evil, and it is impossible for me to
make a moral judgment. I tend to regard them as one of their outlaw
protagonists and even though they probably wouldn't think much of me, I think
the world of them. This is the inherent dilemma one faces when dealing with
art: the fact that I viscerally agree with their themes and storytelling
although I may morally have apprehensions regarding some of their ideologies
and prejudices. I however don't find it as malicious as most people do. It's
not that they thought of us as a subhuman race it's just that they were
intrigued and baffled at our ways with a sort of quasi-scientific sense of
wonder. Like a dreary child lost in casual contemplation of the oppressive
overhead sun and blaming it on nature's inherent malevolence. I may get
clobbered for saying this but their racism doesn't bother me anymore than a
schoolyard bully's antagonism might. I tend to look at them as characters and
as archetypes bordering on the mythic. Guys like Mark Twain, Edgar Allan Poe,
H.P Lovecraft may have been racist but their racism has yielded far more
interesting work than many a man's sanctimony. The Korda Brothers and Carol
Reed always shot these exotic locales with a great deal of care and delicacy
and captured their dwellings and denizens with immense affection. There is an
implicit pastoralism in images of cows ploughing dried up paddy fields and
distant tracts of vegetation, long shots of terrace farming and other forms of
indigenous cultivation, but there is also at work an almost abstract
ambivalence. There was love as well as loathing in their gaze. Same probably
goes for the people that wrote about these subjects. A sensitive guy like Reed
probably got that about these adventure story tellers. Interest in something
may be stimulated by ulterior reasons but when it culminates in something
constructive it is a different matter altogether from casual racism, the sort inflicted
upon a street corner or at a restaurant, and qualifies in my estimation as a
subject for contemplation. It's all very well for me to be saying this sitting
amongst my own folk and kin where I don't experience racism on a day to day
basis. I might feel differently sitting on foreign shores amidst white folk,
but I have to recognise that an obscure masterpiece like Outcast of the Islands
may have been orientalism, but in my view this was poetic orientalism. Never
before had the white man's burden found such an elaborate showcase. When Conrad
writes about or Reed shoots these savage dwellings, they are as enchanted by
them as Adam might have been by the Garden of Eden. The spirit of adventure and
the constant quest for discovery and inquiry fuels their imagery. When Ralph
Richardson proclaims--'To the North wind my boy! To the North wind' before
casting sail and setting oars to steer into the abyss of foaming waves and
crashing gusts, it is a heroic moment and a transcendent one too, and one that
fits nicely in with Conrad's own peculiar heroism. The sea is a place of karmic
significance… a hazy twilight floating into the grimy shores of the cosmos.
Orbiting mankind and casting a severe spell as well as passing judgment. The
old sailors were all her slaves and she their willful master. And they lay
forever at the mercy of her whims and fancies. 'The sea of old' as Conrad used
to put. I am always deeply stirred with Ralph Richardson's mournful recitation--'Life she is fowl. Fowl as a tangled rigging on a netted night', having
acknowledged his mistake of having given the irredeemable a second chance. 'But
you are young yet,' he says, 'and life is very long, let this be a lesson to
ya.'
About Author -
Vivaan Shah is an actor, director, writer, musician, singer, and painter. He has tried his hands at various art forms though acting is the one through which he earns his bread and butter. He studied in The Doon School, St.Stephen's College and Jai Hind College. He has been active in the theatre scene since he was a child. Theatre is unquestionably the most important medium in his life. Currently he is trying to make it as a fiction writer of genre and hardboiled novels.
Readers, please feel free to share your opinion by leaving your comments. As always your valuable thoughts are highly appreciated!
Previous Post: Sanju: Day 1 Box-Office
Next Post: Sanjay Mishra, Adil Hussain and Divya Dutta grace the closing ceremony of 9th Jagran Film Festival
Next Post: Sanjay Mishra, Adil Hussain and Divya Dutta grace the closing ceremony of 9th Jagran Film Festival
People who liked this also liked...
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for sharing for valuable opinion. We would be delighted to have you back.